While performing in Denver, Van Ark met actress Julie Harris while interviewing her for a local newspaper, and the actress persuaded her to study acting and drama at the Yale Drama School.
As a result, Van Ark became the youngest student ever to receive a scholarship to the well-respected school and the second woman ever to enroll. The first woman was Julie Harris, who helped Van Ark into the school.
“She wrote to the dean and asked him to meet me. Long story short, my parents drove me to New Haven, Connecticut, to meet the dean, who gave me a scholarship,” she recalled.” It was meant to be.”
Valene Ewing on ‘Dallas’ and ‘Knots Landing’
Van Ark began her professional career at the Minneapolis Guthrie Theater, where she starred in The Miser by Moliere. After working about a year at the Arena Stage in Washington DC, she moved down to work with the national touring company Barefoot in the Park in 1963, which led to her Broadway debut. In 1971, she was nominated for the Tony Award for Best Featured Actress in a Play after starring in The School for Wives.
At that point, Joan Van Ark had begun working in front of a screen rather than on stage. She appeared on television series including Temperature’s Rising, Spider-Woman, and Days of Our Lives and even in one episode of Bonanza.
Even though Joan Van Ark wasn’t short of jobs, she was still looking for her significant breakthrough role as the 1980s approached. In 1978, she made several appearances as Valene Ewing on Dallas – which led her to the role of a lifetime.
Knots Landing – a spinoff of Dallas – premiered in 1979, and Joan Van Ark reprised her role as Valene Ewing. She starred in 327 episodes – acting alongside Michele Lee as Karen and Ted Schakleford as Gary – and became a massive star.
Even though it was a spinoff of Dallas – about the rotten but wealthy Ewing Clan – it was initially brought to CBS years before.
However, the network wanted a “big rich family” show, and Dallas got picked as the one. But later on, Knots Landing became a massive success as the studio realized how big of a show Dallas had grown into, and after only one season, it rose into the top 20 in TV ratings.
How Joan Van Ark almost missed out on her biggest role
Knots Landing became the story of Gary Ewing and his wife Valene – played by Van Ark – and how they decided to start a new life in Knots Landing.
However, Van Ark almost missed out on the part of Valene Ewing. She explained that she had a “three-way clash” where she did The Love Boat simultaneously, as well as a commercial in New York.
In the end, it was her husband – John Marshall, who we will come back to in a minute – that persuaded her into choosing Dallas. And it was a significant – and important – decision.
“I got the call asking me to do a guest appearance in this show called Dallas, which was attracting a lot of buzz, but I said to my husband, ‘John, why should I even read this script? I can’t be in three places at once,’” she told Express. “Then he read it and said, ‘No, you’ve got to do it. It looks wonderful.’”
“So basically, he talked me into a schedule that had me in LA one day, then flying to Dallas for two days, followed by two days in New York and then back to Texas. But looking at this old cast photo from Knots Landing – the spinoff from Dallas – I’m so glad I listened to him,” she added.
Dallas and Knots Landing became a 15-year commitment for Van Ark, who became identified by her role. As earlier mentioned, she and Julie Harris had quite a history – and in 1980, they met again
“I could stay forever on the show and be safe”
Harris was cast in Knots Landing as the mother of Van Arks’ character, and for the actress, it was almost too good to be true.
“When the producers told me they had finally last someone to play my mother, I held my breath,” she recalled in a 1984 interview with Florida Today.
“I thought, ‘Oh my God, are they going to say Phyllis Diller or Zsa Zsa Gabor, or who?’ Then they said it was Julie Harris, and I went right through the roof. I couldn’t believe they had picked her to be my mother. They didn’t even know we were friends.”
Joan Van Ark stayed for 13 seasons and 327 episodes on the show. Then in 1993, just one season after she left, Knots Landing was canceled. But the reason for Joan leaving wasn’t that she didn’t like it. Instead, it was all about her trying on new challenges.“I could stay forever on the show and be safe,” Van Ark told the Los Angeles Times in 1992.
“But three years ago, I did Night of the Iguana in Williamstown (Mass.), and I had a quote from Tennessee Williams taped on my mirror, taken from an essay he’d written on success. It said, and I’m paraphrasing here: ‘Security is in the shape of a kidney-shaped pool in Los Angeles, where you sit waiting for your residual checks.’ I was in a comfortable spot on Knots, and an artist should not be comfortable.”
At the same time, the television series became a huge part of Van Ark’s life. So even though she felt comfortable leaving, it was a tough blow since she thought it would be easier.
Blamed herself for ‘Knots Landing’ cancelation
“I have loved more than life the 13 years I’ve had on that show,” she said. “[Knots Landing creator] David Jacobs is a great influence on my life, has taught me so much about so many things. Ted [Shackelford] is the other half of every breath I take on the show, and personally, he’s a large part of my heart. The people are my family–we have shared marriages, deaths, divorces. It’s far more difficult to leave than I thought.”
The show didn’t quite work without the great chemistry between characters Valen and Gary. In fact, Joan took the blame for the show being shut down.
“Well, it was my fault. I jumped over to NBC to do a pilot which did not sell,” she said. “I was so ready to go, after fourteen years with the one lady, so I auditioned for the pilot, and they cast me. It wasn’t as cleanly negotiated as it should have been. When the pilot didn’t sell, they asked me back, and I did do the four-hour finale of the show.”
Joan Van Ark left the soap opera business behind but continued to star in many television series. She had minor parts in television series, including Fresh Prince of Bel-Air, and starred in some television movies. Between 2004 and 2005, Joan appeared as Gloria Fisher in 55 episodes of the hugely successful television drama The Young and The Restless.Joan Van Ark – marriage, husband, children
It’s common for celebrities in Hollywood to marry other celebrities, and show-biz marriages don’t always last very long.
But that wasn’t the case for Joan Van Ark, who met the love of her life back in high school. She met her husband, John Marshall, while the two were students in Boulder. In 1966, the couple married on a military base in Germany.
“Believe me, it was nothing like the marriages [Valene Ewing] has gone through,” she told UPI.
In 1969, they welcomed daughter Vanessa Marshall, who also chose a career in entertainment. She became a well-known voice-over artist and actually gave up on her on-camera acting career. Instead, Vanessa Marshall has lent her voice to animated films, television series, and several video games.
John Marshall went on to become an Emmy newsman, working on KNBC-TV and NBC. He’s had a flourishing career just as his wife Joan, and while the couple was working hard to make it in their respective fields, Vanessa was growing up.
For Van Ark, becoming a mother while trying to navigate through the business was tough. And she gives credit to her husband, John, for keeping the family together during those stressful years.
“He is the reason we have the most wonderful daughter in the world and that the marriage has stayed strong,” Van Ark told The Leader-Post in 1988. “I feel I am the committed person who can’t give up time for this or that.”
“He did not want to miss watching Venessa grow up, and he did not want to miss me,” she added. “He knows correspondents live out of suitcases. John made career choices I didn’t agree with because if it had been me, I would have packed my bags, and I would have been waiving at the airport.”Joan Van Ark – net worth
Besides her acting job, Joan Van Ark has a great interest in running. The 78-year-old has completed several marathons and explained she’s running instead of going to a psychologist. However, when it comes to her husband, she stated that she would never go on a run with him.
Why? Because “it’s the quickest way to a divorce that I know of. You’re always criticizing the other’s style,” Joan said.
In the last decade, Joan Van Ark has continued to work on stage in several productions for theater and starring in television series and movies such as Watercolor Postcards and Psycho Wedding Crasher. But she will always be most remembered for her magnificent spell on Dallas and Knots Landing.
According to Celebrity Net Worth, Joan Van Ark has a net worth of around $10 million.
Effects of smartphone restriction on cue-related neural activity
Smartphones have become an inseparable part of modern life, revolutionizing communication, work, and entertainment. However, excessive smartphone use (ESU) has been linked to various negative consequences, including addiction-like behaviors, impaired mental health, and diminished attention spans. Recent studies suggest that smartphone-related cues can trigger neural responses similar to those seen in substance addiction, reinforcing compulsive usage patterns. Understanding the effects of smartphone restriction on cue-related neural activity can provide valuable insights into developing interventions for individuals struggling with ESU.
The Role of Cue Reactivity in Smartphone Use
Cue reactivity (CR) refers to the brain’s response to stimuli associated with a habitual or addictive behavior. In the case of smartphone use, cues may include notification sounds, phone screens lighting up, or simply seeing a smartphone in one’s environment. These cues can activate reward-related brain regions, reinforcing the compulsive urge to check the device.
Research has shown that individuals with excessive smartphone use exhibit heightened neural responses to smartphone-related cues, similar to those observed in substance addiction. This heightened sensitivity may contribute to difficulty in controlling smartphone usage, leading to a cycle of compulsive checking and craving.
Investigating Neural Activity Changes Through Smartphone Restriction
To better understand how short-term smartphone restriction influences brain activity, researchers conducted a study using functional MRI (fMRI) to measure changes in cue-related neural responses over 72 hours of smartphone abstinence. The study involved 25 young adults who were regular smartphone users.
Video : What Happens To Your Brain When You Mindlessly Scroll?
Study Design and Methods
- Participants were instructed to refrain from using their smartphones for 72 hours.
- A cue-reactivity task was designed, where participants were exposed to images of smartphones (both active and inactive) as well as neutral objects.
- Functional MRI scans were conducted before and after the restriction period to analyze changes in brain activity.
- Psychometric assessments were used to measure craving, self-control, and emotional responses associated with smartphone use.
Key Findings: How the Brain Adapts to Smartphone Restriction
1. Reduced Activation in the Reward System
One of the most striking findings was a significant reduction in activity in the nucleus accumbens and anterior cingulate cortex after 72 hours of smartphone restriction. These brain regions are heavily involved in reward processing and habit formation.
- The nucleus accumbens is associated with motivation and reinforcement learning. High activation in this area suggests strong craving and compulsive behavior.
- The anterior cingulate cortex plays a role in decision-making and impulse control. Reduced activity here indicates that participants may have experienced less compulsion to check their smartphones.
These findings suggest that even a short break from smartphone use can lead to neuroplasticity, allowing the brain to become less reactive to smartphone-related cues.
2. Alterations in Dopamine and Serotonin-Linked Activity
Further analysis using neurotransmitter probability maps revealed that activity changes in the reward system were closely linked to dopamine and serotonin receptor probabilities.
- Dopamine is a key neurotransmitter in reward-seeking behavior and addiction.
- Serotonin is involved in mood regulation and impulse control.
The findings suggest that smartphone restriction may influence neurochemical processes that drive compulsive behaviors. This could explain why some people feel withdrawal-like symptoms, including restlessness and anxiety, when they suddenly stop using their phones.
3. Increased Engagement of the Parietal Cortex
Another notable result was the increased activity in the parietal cortex, a region associated with attentional control and sensory processing.
- This suggests that participants became more aware of their environment and less preoccupied with smartphone-related distractions.
- Heightened parietal cortex activity was correlated with reduced craving scores, indicating improved cognitive control over impulsive smartphone use.
This supports the idea that limiting smartphone use can enhance focus and attentional regulation, reducing dependency on digital devices.
4. Reduced Compulsive Checking Behavior
Behavioral assessments showed that participants experienced a significant decrease in the urge to check their smartphones over time. This aligns with the observed neural changes in reward sensitivity and impulse control.
Participants also reported improvements in:
- Sleep quality: Reduced exposure to blue light and nighttime scrolling led to better sleep patterns.
- Social interactions: Without constant phone distractions, participants engaged more with people around them.
- Mental well-being: Several individuals noted feeling less anxious and more present in their daily activities.
Implications for Smartphone Addiction and Digital Detox Strategies
The findings of this study have significant implications for individuals struggling with excessive smartphone use. While a complete break from smartphones may not be feasible for everyone, implementing digital detox strategies can help manage usage and mitigate negative effects.
1. Scheduled Smartphone Breaks
- Taking regular breaks from smartphone use, even for a few hours a day, can help reset neural responses to digital cues.
- Setting specific times for checking messages rather than responding to every notification can reduce compulsive checking.
2. Mindful Technology Use
- Practicing conscious smartphone use by turning off unnecessary notifications and using grayscale mode can help decrease reliance on digital stimuli.
- Engaging in non-digital hobbies, such as reading, exercise, or meditation, can strengthen attention control and reduce smartphone dependency.
3. Sleep Hygiene and Nighttime Restrictions
- Avoiding smartphone use one hour before bed can improve sleep quality by preventing blue light exposure.
- Using do not disturb or airplane mode at night can minimize the temptation to check notifications.
4. Awareness Campaigns and Education
- Schools, workplaces, and mental health professionals can promote awareness of the impact of excessive smartphone use on brain function.
- Implementing digital wellness programs can encourage balanced technology use.
Video : Cell Phones Affect Brain Activity
Conclusion: How Smartphone Restriction Reshapes the Brain
The study provides compelling evidence that even a short period of smartphone restriction can lead to measurable changes in brain activity. The observed reductions in reward-related neural responses, coupled with increased attentional control, suggest that limiting smartphone use can promote cognitive flexibility, impulse control, and overall mental well-being.
As smartphone addiction continues to be a growing concern, understanding the neurological basis of cue-reactivity and digital dependency is crucial. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating healthy technology habits to ensure that smartphones remain tools for convenience rather than sources of compulsive behavior.
By making small adjustments in smartphone usage, individuals can foster better focus, improved mental clarity, and greater overall life satisfaction. So, why not start with a 72-hour break and see how your brain adapts?
Leave a Reply