Barbra Streisand and James Brolin are celebrating their 25th wedding anniversary this year. The couple opened up about their journey together and reflected on what it means to find love later in life.
They recently revealed a surprising secret about their relationship that had been kept secret for years. Read on to find out what they shared!
Their love story, like many others, began with a blind date. Barbra was dating James, but had a different idea of what he would look like. She expected a man with a full head of hair and a beard and was surprised to find Brolin bald.
True to her easy-going nature, Streisand didn’t hold back and jokingly pointed out that his hair was a bit messy. Instead of being offended, Brolin immediately felt a connection and realized she was someone special. While it took Streisand a few more outings to fully accept her feelings, the two soon fell in love and married in 1998.
This was not her first marriage; Streisand was previously married to Elliot Gould from 1961 to 1973, with whom she has a son, Jason. Brolin has also had two previous marriages, first to casting agent Jane Agee for 20 years and then to Jane Smithers for almost a decade. From these relationships he has three children: Josh, Jess and Molly, and four grandchildren: Eden, Trevor, Westlyn and Chapel.
Brolin often expresses his deep affection for Streisand, once saying: “Every night is a new adventure. Sleeping is a waste of time. I can’t wait to see her again in the morning”.
In a recent interview with Gayle King on CBS Mornings, the couple celebrated their milestone anniversary by sharing a surprising revelation: Brolin was celibate for three years before meeting Streisand.
“I was literally abstinent for three years and I asked myself: ‘Who needs that?’” he confessed, which provoked disbelief from King. Streisand playfully admonished him, shouting: “You can’t say that!”
When asked about his long period without intimacy, Brolin explained: “I had no interest in getting involved in a crappy situation”. Reflecting on their connection, he remarked: “After three years, that must have been one hell of a night?” to which he replied: “Wild!”
His reluctance stemmed from his previous marriages, as he did not want to enter into another unfulfilling relationship. However, a friend encouraged him to meet Barbra and the rest is history. It took some persuasion, but after asking her three times, Streisand finally agreed to marry him.
It’s surprising to learn that Brolin was celibate for such a long time! Their story is heartwarming and shows how they found each other despite all the odds. What do you think about their pairing? Share it in the comments! Feel free to pass this on to others to know their thoughts!
Can You Spot the Mistake in This Puzzle?
Over the years, many people have made solving puzzles their favorite leisure time. They range in difficulty from ones that appear to take an eternity to ones that can be finished in a matter of seconds. The mystery and attractiveness of certain puzzles are increased by their unsolved nature.
Views on puzzles are divided; some people adore them, while others don’t. Regardless of your enjoyment level, solving puzzles is an excellent mental workout. They inspire us to think creatively and unconventionally in order to solve issues.
A certain conundrum that has been circulating on the internet lately has many people perplexed. It doesn’t even appear to be a puzzle at first glance. The image consists only of the digits 1 through 15 arranged side by side, along with a statement requesting that viewers repost the image if they discover any errors.
At first glance, everything appears to be in order. There are no errors in the sequence of numbers one through fifteen; they are all present and accounted for. You could go over the figures a few times to make sure there are no discrepancies, but everything seems to be in order.
You might think beyond the box as a result of this. Is the missing zero the cause of the error? Or should the number sixteen be a part of the puzzle? Perhaps there’s a problem with the spacing? It’s flawless when you inspect the spacing. Is it possible that a 1 is misinterpreted for an I? No, they’re all unmistakably 1. Is the six not quite right? No, it’s also flawless. Where is the mistake, then?
You may eventually notice that they’re asking you to locate the “mitsake” rather than the error and turn your attention from the numbers to the instructions. That’s correct: the term
Leave a Reply