According to the documents, Webb was the “head of Jolie’s security detail for two decades, and he remained in that role for approximately four years after the couple divorced.”
Webb stated that Jolie “required him and his contractors to sign NDAs relating to various personal and professional details of her, and her family’s, life.”
After the couple filed for divorce, they had a major custody battle over their six children. According to the documents, Webb claimed he “received multiple calls from Jolie’s representative, who told Mr. Webb to remind his staff that they had entered into NDAs with Jolie and that if they testified in a custody proceeding, Jolie would sue them.”
Webb said that he had conveyed the message to his contractors, and both of them confirmed that they would testify if they were to be subpoenaed.
The documents further claimed that “one of them told Webb that ‘he would testify about statements he overheard that Ms. Jolie made to the children, encouraging them to avoid spending time with Mr. Pitt during custody visits.’”
The documents also stated that the “the two security contractors both testified” despite being threated with being sued and shortly after, Mr. Webb’s company was fired by Jolie.
Webb himself does not claim to have heard Jolie’s directive instructing the children not to interact with Pitt during custody visits. He now also works for Pitt.
Jolie’s attorney, Paul Murphy has since then addressed the media over this matter. He said in a statement, “Mr. Pitt’s continued attempt to equate common NDAs for security personnel and housekeepers covering confidential information employees learn at work, with him demanding an expanded NDA to ensure the continued coverup of his deplorable actions remains shameful.” “This case is not about NDAs in general, but about power and control. All Angelina has ever wanted was separation and health, with positive relationships between all members of their family, including Mr. Pitt. She looks forward to the day when he is finally able to let her go,” the statement further read.
The latest filing comes after over a month after Jolie’s lawyer filed documents claiming that Pitt had been physically abusive toward her even before the alleged infamous plane incident of 2016. That incident, according to documents, was the final straw in asking for a divorce.
The motion that Jolie’s legal team filed in early April, most revolved around the dispute over their shares of ownership in their French winery estate, Château Miraval.
Her legal team filed a motion asking the court to compel Pitt and his legal team to provide “responses” and “documents” that explained why the actor “suddenly conditioned his purchase of Jolie’s share of Miraval on her agreeing to a greatly expanded NDA now covering Pitt’s personal misconduct, whether related to Miraval or not.”
Jolie firmly claims that this move to demand NDAs was Pitt’s attempt to “cover up” the alleged abuse against Jolie and their children.
Pitt was never charged with a crime after authorities investigated the 2016 plane incident.
In contrast to what Jolie’s legal team is saying, Pitt’s lawyers allege that it was Jolie and her team who requested a “broader” NDA.
Jenny, a proud cowgirl, wanted to surprise her husband, Mike, with a fun photo, but…
Jenny, a proud cowgirl, wanted to give her spouse Mike a funny picture as a surprise. She captured the scene to share with him while sitting in the back of a pickup truck, all out in cowgirl attire. She was unaware that this innocuous gesture would have such a profound effect.
Jenny showed Mike the photo with great excitement, knowing he would appreciate the lighthearted surprise. Mike was taken aback to discover, upon closer inspection, that Jenny had removed her wedding ring.
He became suspicious and tried to investigate by enlarging the picture. He was surprised to see more than just Jenny dressed like a cowgirl through the pickup truck’s rear window. The man’s face was visible in the reflection.
Mike was taken aback upon seeing Jenny’s 19-year-old ex-boyfriend.
Mike questioned Jenny about her ex-boyfriend’s unexpected appearance in the photo, feeling bewildered and hurt. Jenny acknowledged the seriousness of the situation and claimed that it was only a fortuitous meeting. She had not noticed the mirror, and the photographer happened to be her ex-boyfriend.
On the other hand, Mike began to doubt their marriage after hearing the news. What was supposed to be a happy surprise took on an unexpected degree of stress when Jenny’s ex-boyfriend unexpectedly showed up in the shot and there was no wedding ring. In the midst of an emotional breakdown, Mike made the decision to divorce Jenny.
The trust that had kept their marriage intact had been destroyed by the seemingly harmless cowgirl shot. Jenny and Mike had to deal with the unanticipated consequences of a picture that had taken an unexpected turn while they negotiated the difficulties of divorce.
The event was a sobering reminder that in a relationship, even seemingly insignificant details may matter. It was shown how important it is to have trust, communicate, and understand one another, and how unforeseen circumstances can occasionally result in actions that change people’s lives.
Leave a Reply