Surprising Scientific Study Challenges Conventional Beauty Standards
Science often confirms what we already know, but occasionally, it surprises us with new findings that challenge conventional beliefs. A recent scientific study has raised eyebrows by suggesting that a 43-year-old model may possess the ‘ideal figure.’ In this article, we delve into the study’s revelations and explore the evolving standards of beauty.
The Ever-Changing Ideal Body Type
Traditionally, the fashion industry has favored extremely slim body types, epitomized by iconic models like Kate Moss. Marilyn Monroe’s voluptuous figure, once admired, has been replaced by the preference for an hourglass shape. However, a groundbreaking study from Texas University has questioned this longstanding notion.
Embracing Fuller and Curvier Figures
The study indicates that a ‘fuller’ and ‘curvier’ body type is preferred among women. The ideal body mass index (BMI) is identified as 18.85, with specific measurements for bust size, waist, and hips. Interestingly, these specifications closely align with those of British model Kelly Brook, whose appearance challenges today’s beauty standards.
Beauty Lies in the Eye of the Beholder
It is crucial to acknowledge that attractiveness is subjective, and people have diverse aesthetic preferences. While the study identifies an ‘ideal’ body type based on scientific data, it does not invalidate other body shapes as unacceptable or unattractive. It merely challenges the conventional notion that thinness is the sole measure of beauty.
Celebrating Diversity in Beauty
Recognizing the variance in perceptions of attractiveness is particularly relevant in contemporary society, which increasingly values diversity. The modeling industry has gradually embraced plus-size models, exemplified by trailblazers like Ashley Graham. Such inclusivity highlights that all body types can be stunning and should be celebrated.
The scientific study challenging conventional beauty standards sparks thought-provoking discussions about attractiveness and societal norms. While it identifies an ‘ideal’ body type, it does not diminish the beauty of other forms. Embracing diversity in beauty empowers individuals to appreciate their uniqueness and promotes a more inclusive perspective on attractiveness. As we continue to evolve, let us celebrate the myriad ways beauty manifests itself in our world.
What are your views on the study’s conclusions and the evolving standards of beauty? Join the conversation and share your opinions in the comments section. Let your friends and family participate in this thought-provoking discussion!
Masterchef contestant was immediately removed from show after dish she served judges
Warning: This article contains images of a dead animal some readers may find distressing.
A Masterchef contestant was immediately removed from the show after serving up the judges a questionable dish that had them spitting feathers – literally.
Oh, Masterchef.
There’s nothing better than watching over confident contestants talk themselves up on the VT – only to have them produce an absolute abomination of the dish that the judges’ waste no time in ripping into.
We all like to sit on our sofas, Goggleboxing and declaring that we could do better.
Although this time, most of us probably could because anything would be better than what one contestant served up on Masterchef Espãna.
Saray Carrillo served up a questionable dish. (Masterchef Espana / YouTube)
Sometimes when you’re cooking, not every job is pleasant, and if you want to serve up something that looks delicious and inviting, sometimes you have to get a little bit dirty.
And that’s something this contestant had no plans of doing.
In 2020, Saray Carrillo, 27, was mortified by one of the challenges where she had to pluck and cook a whole partridge.
Unless you’re vegan or vegetarian, cutting up poultry is pretty standard cooking practice, but Carrillo apparently expressed her fear of having to do such a task and took the challenge as a personal attack.
Defiantly, she decided to serve the bird, unplucked, uncooked and unappetising, garnished on a bed of spring onions, some kind of sauce and garnished with a couple of cherry tomatoes.
Take a look:
Umm, yeah. (Masterchef Espana / YouTube)
I think it’s hilarious, but the judges certainly didn’t think so – the only way to describe the look on their faces is ‘p*ssed’.
This was only exasperated more when Carrillo approached the bench with a cheeky smirk on her face, whilst the rest of the contestants looked on in horror by the dish she was presenting.
One judge said something in Spanish that translated to: “This is never seen in MasterChef.”
The judges, rightly so, grilled Carrillo and were not exactly sad to see the back of her.
As she plonked her apron down on the bench and strutted out of the Masterchef kitchen, the judges watched her leave with faces like a slapped a**.
The clip was from a season that aired in 2020 and went viral at the time, and has since been viewed 7.4 million times on YouTube.Play
People were quick to mock the episode on social media.
One YouTube user wrote: “HOW DISGUSTING GOD, I really can’t handle cherry tomatoes.”
Someone else saw fit to quote TV Chef legend Gordon Ramsay saying: “IT’S SO RAW THAT IT CAN STILL FLY!”
While another brutally said: “It is tragic that a person like this is a social educator when in reality she is yet to be civilized.”
I wonder what John and Greg would have made of all this?
Leave a Reply