Photo editing programs have long been a part of our lives, so you can rarely see a photo that hasn’t been retouched. However, it’s wrong to think that Photoshop belongs only to the modern world. People have been improving the looks of their portraits for centuries. That means there were specialists in photo retouching that date all the way back to the nineteenth century. Even painters have worked hard to make models look more beautiful than they really were.
At Bright Side, we searched the archives and found photos of royalty from the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century, and we compared them to their portrait paintings. At the end of the article, we’ll show you what Vincent van Gogh really looked like.
Isabella II of Spain (1830 — 1904)
Mary of Teck, the spouse of George V (1867 — 1953)
Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon, the mother of Queen Elizabeth II (1900 — 2002)
Princess Helena of the United Kingdom (1846 — 1923)
Victoria, Princess Royal, German Empress (1840 — 1901)
Charlotte of Belgium (1840 — 1927)
Sophie of Württemberg, Queen of the Netherlands (1818 — 1877)
Queen Victoria (1819 — 1901)
Maria Christina of Austria, Queen-consort of Spain (1858 — 1929)
Maria Luisa of Bourbon-Parma, Princess-consort of Bulgaria (1870 — 1899)
Grand Duchess Elena Vladimirovna of Russia (1882 — 1957)
Princess Beatrice of the United Kingdom, Queen Victoria’s fifth daughter (1857 — 1944)
Alexandra Feodorovna, the spouse of Nicholas II of Russia (1872 — 1918)
Princess Alice of Battenberg, the mother-in-law of Queen Elizabeth II (1885 — 1969)
Alexandra of Denmark, the spouse of Edward VII (1844 — 1925)
onus: Vincent van Gogh (1853 — 1890)
What do you think about Photoshop? Do you use it often? Tell us in the comments below.
Cruise and Kidman’s Adopted Children, This is How Their Entire Adult Child Looks Like
This dynamic duo was hailed as one of Hollywood’s most formidable and visually stunning pairs. However, their journey to parenthood took a different route as they faced the challenge of not having biological children. In a heartwarming turn of events in 1992, the actor chose to embrace fatherhood by adopting a young girl.
Their adopted son was merely six years old when the union between the parents dissolved. In the aftermath of their separation, a legal decision mandated that both parties share parental responsibilities for their children.
Despite Kidman’s bustling schedule filled with acting commitments and globetrotting adventures, she struggled to carve out time for her offspring. Fast forward to today, and we catch a glimpse of Isabella, their adopted daughter, all grown up.
Kidman found herself powerless to shield her children from the influence of her husband, who had delved deeply into the realms of Scientology. Faced with limited options, she reluctantly relinquished control.
Interestingly, history seemed to repeat itself as the man’s subsequent marriage also crumbled under the strain of Scientology. Meanwhile, Nicole embarked on a new chapter, exchanging vows with a talented guitarist and embracing the joys of parenthood with their biological offspring.
As time wore on, the once-close bond between the renowned actress and her adopted children faded into obscurity. It’s only recently that they resurfaced, captured together for the first time in two years.
Leave a Reply