Buckingham Palace shared information regarding the medical procedures undergone by King Charles and Kate Middleton, yet they employed different approaches. Regarding King Charles, the announcement preceded his operation, while for Kate, it was delayed until after her surgery. Insider sources suggest a deliberate decision behind this disparate timing strategy.
According to a palace insider, “It was sensible to be more open about it, as otherwise, people might have thought the worst.”
The official statement emphasized King Charles’s desire to address his diagnosis openly to destigmatize seeking treatment. T
his strategy appears effective, with reports indicating a substantial 1,000% surge in individuals accessing information about prostate enlargement on the U.K.’s National Health Service website following the king’s disclosure.
The rationale behind informing the public about King Charles’ medical procedure beforehand was to avoid rumors and soothe concerns. Opting for transparency aimed to foster a supportive atmosphere.
Conversely, the decision to withhold news about Kate’s surgery until after the procedure was made to afford her privacy during the process.
This meticulous decision-making process also took into account the nature of the surgeries and the public perception of King Charles and Kate Middleton. Through this approach, Buckingham Palace effectively disseminated information while upholding privacy, consequently stimulating increased public engagement in health discussions.
Princess Kate underwent a procedure concerning her abdominal area. According to a royal insider, she is reported to be “doing well.” Her hospital stay is expected to span between 10 to 14 days, followed by a three-month recovery period at home. While the palace did not disclose specific details regarding the condition, they did confirm it is not cancer-related.
In a message shared by the palace, Kate expressed gratitude for the public’s concern. She emphasized her desire for a sense of normalcy for her children and requested that her health-related information remain private.
Céline Dion is another beloved public figure who has been struggling with her health lately. A few months ago, the star’s sister shared updates about her health as fans were deeply concerned.
The Corpse of Drew Barrymore’s Grandfather Was Stolen for One Last Celebration
John Barrymore came from a long line of theater actors. He himself first appeared on stage alongside his father in 1900, and in 1903 officially began his career, starring in the likes of Justice (1916) and Richard III (1920). His greatest role was his 1992 appearance in Hamlet, for which he was dubbed “the greatest living American tragedian.”
Barrymore also starred in a slew of silent films, most notably Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde (1920), Sherlock Holmes (1922) and Beau Brummel (1924). He later made the transition to sound movies, starring in the likes of Grand Hotel (1932) and Midnight (1939).
On May 29, 1942, Barrymore died at the age of 60 from pneumonia and cirrhosis. What happened next has been the subject of many rumors. It’s alleged his friends, Errol Flynn, W.C. Fields and Sadakichi Hartmann snuck into the morgue where his body was being held, propped him up against a poker table and allowed him to experience one final celebration.
As it turns out, these rumors are true! In an August 2020 episode of the popular YouTube series Hot Ones, the acting legend’s granddaughter, Drew Barrymore, revealed his corpse had actually been stolen.
“Not only yes, but there have been cinematic interpretations of it,” she exclaimed. Those interpretations include S.O.B., starring Julie Andrews, and allegedly the 1989 comedy Weekend at Bernie’s, in which two friends pretend their deceased boss is alive.
Barrymore added that she wants the same to happen to her. “I will say this, I hope my friends do the same for me. That is the kind of spirit I can get behind. Just prop the old bag up, let’s have a few rounds.
“I think death comes with so much morose sadness and I understand that, but if it’s okay, just for me, if everybody could be really happy and celebratory and have a party, that would be my preference.”
Vintage Hollywood certainly was a different era…
Leave a Reply