In the 1974 film “The Life and Times of Grizzly Adams” and the NBC television series of the same name, Dan Haggerty portrayed a kind mountain man with a lush beard and a bear named Ben. Haggerty passed away on Friday in Burbank, California.
He was seventy-three.
According to his buddy and manager Terry Bomar, the cause was spine cancer.
Mr. Haggerty was employed in Hollywood as an animal trainer and stuntman when a producer asked him to reprise portions of the film’s opening sequences, which were about a woodsman and his bear.
Based on Charles Sellier Jr.’s novel “The Life and Times of Grizzly Adams,” it narrated the tale of a man from California who runs away from the woods after being wrongfully convicted of murder. There, he befriends the local wildlife and tames an abandoned bear.
Mr. Haggerty consented, provided that he may do the full film. After being remade for $165,000, the movie finally brought in close to $30 million from ticket sales. After that, it was made into a television series, and in February 1977, Mr. Haggerty returned to his environmentally conscious duty as the forest’s defender and animal buddy.
John Leonard described the first episode in The New York Times as “lukewarm to the heart.” Mad Jack (Denver Pyle) and the honorable red man Makuma (Don Shanks) bring bread and advise to the man and bear who have taken up residence in a log cabin. Bear washes his fur while the man traps his as they depart the cabin. There’s also a lot of connecting with nature, raccoons, owls, deer, bunnies, hawks, badgers, cougars, and a lump in the throat.
Warm and nostalgic, the show won over fans to Mr. Haggerty, who went on to win the 1978 People’s Choice Award for best new series actor. “Grizzly Adams” gave rise to two sequels: “Legend of the Wild,” which aired in 1978 and was eventually released in theaters in 1981; and “The Capture of Grizzly Adams,” which aired as a TV movie in 1982 and saw Adams being brought back to his hometown by bounty hunters in order to clear his record.
On November 19, 1942, Daniel Francis Haggerty was born in Los Angeles. After his parents divorced when he was three years old, he had a difficult upbringing and repeatedly escaped from military school. Eventually, he moved in with his actor father in Burbank, California.
He wed Diane Rooker at the age of 17. The union broke down in divorce. In 2008, he lost his second wife, Samantha Hilton, in a motorbike accident. His children, Don, Megan, Tracy, Dylan, and Cody, survive him.
In his debut movie, “Muscle Beach Party” (1964), he starred with Frankie Avalon and Annette Funicello as physique builder Biff. Then came came cameos in nature and motorcycle movies, such as “Biker With Bandana” and “Bearded Biker.” In “Easy Rider,” he made a fleeting appearance as a visitor to the hippie commune visited by Dennis Hopper and Peter Fonda.
In reality, Mr. Haggerty kept a variety of wild animals that he had either tamed from birth or rescued from harm on his tiny ranch in Malibu Canyon. His abilities brought him work as a stuntman and animal trainer on the television shows “Daktari” and “Tarzan,” in addition to sporadic roles in movies. “People magazine didn’t like actors jumping on them,” he said in 1978.
He acted as a Siberian tiger trapper in “Where the North Wind Blows” (1974), one of his outdoor-themed flicks, and in “The Adventures of Frontier Fremont” (1976). In the David Carradine movie “Americana,” he had an appearance as a dog trainer (1983). He portrayed a figure who was strikingly similar to Grizzly Adams in the movies “Grizzly Mountain” (1997) and “Escape to Grizzly Mountain” (2000).
As his career faded, Mr. Haggerty starred in horror movies such as “Axe Giant: The Wrath of Paul Bunyan” (2013), “Terror Night” (1987), and “Elves” (1989), in which he played an inebriated mall Santa. He was given a 90-day jail sentence in 1985 for supplying cocaine to two police agents who were undercover.
A negligent diner carrying a flaming cocktail ignited Mr. Haggerty’s well-known beard in 1977. He attempted to put out the fire, but instead burned his arms in the third degree. He was sent to a hospital where he would have therapy that would likely take a month.
“For the first few days, I was like a wounded wolf trying to heal myself—I just laid in the dark room drinking water,” he said to People. “Nurses urged me to open the curtains and attempted to give me morphine.” But occasionally, animals have better medical knowledge than humans. After ten days, he left the hospital on foot.
Taylor Swift Apologizes to Fans: ‘I Didn’t Know Endorsing Kamala Would Be Such a Buzzkill’
Pop sensation Taylor Swift publicly apologized to her followers, acknowledging that she had greatly miscalculated the backlash following her recent endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris. The move has left both Swifties and political junkies stunned. Given her previous vocal political positions, Swift’s statement that surprised many was, “I didn’t know endorsing Kamala would be such a buzzkill.” Swift appears to be discovering the hard way that combining politics and music doesn’t always make for a harmonious blend.
Swift has positioned herself as a supporter of women’s rights, LGBTQ+ equality, and social justice for many years. Some have praised and others have attacked her progressive credentials, but up until now, she has been able to successfully negotiate the turbulent waters of public opinion without alienating her audience. Swift is already rushing to repair significant damage after it seems that a sizable portion of her fan base is offended by her recent support of Kamala Harris for president.
With a well-meaning Instagram post, it all began. In keeping with her trademark approach, which included tasteful wording, subdued lighting, and a picture-perfect cup of coffee in the background, Taylor Swift backed Kamala Harris, hailing the vice president as a “champion for women and justice.”
Swift said, “I believe in Kamala Harris,” pleading with her millions of fans to back the vice presidential candidate in the next election. As predicted, the post received millions of likes in a matter of hours. However, Swift was unprepared for the storm of criticism that followed, which came from her own followers.
Fans who were dissatisfied, incensed, and even heartbroken promptly left comments. One fan wrote, “When I became a Swiftie, I didn’t sign up for politics.” One more person said, “I adore your music, but this? This is excessive.
Some were less forgiving of Swift, even as many applauded her for utilizing her position to push for change. It turns out that some of Taylor’s followers were not happy with her endorsement, and they expressed their disapproval. Swift felt as though her ideal PR opportunity had vanished out of the blue.
Swift, who is normally so poised and collected, seems taken aback by the ferocity of the criticism. Thus, in an attempt to right the wrong, the singer released a self-aware and regretful statement.
“I apologize, everyone, I really had no idea that supporting Kamala would be such a downer,” Swift said in a video that was uploaded to her Instagram story. “I believed that everyone here shared our commitment to justice for everyone, women supporting women, and other positive ideas. However, I suppose that wasn’t what everyone wanted to hear from me.
Despite being playful and informal, the apology was obviously an attempt to win back some of the supporters she had offended with her political post. Although Swift is adamant about her support for Harris, she conceded that not everyone looks to her for political analysis. Swift remarked, seeming bashful, “You come to me for empowerment anthems, breakups, and love songs.” “I understand. I went too far.
Some fans were understanding of Swift’s effort to heal the rift, but others weren’t as kind. One former admirer wrote, “Too little, too late,” and said that Swift’s apology seemed “disingenuous.” Nevertheless, a lot of people applauded the pop singer for admitting her discomfort and trying to make apologies.
The apology itself seems to add further fuel to the flames. Swifties, who have always taken great satisfaction in their steadfast devotion to the singer, discovered that they might be divided into two groups: those who welcomed her apology and others who thought she had betrayed them by entering the political sphere through their beloved music.
One devoted follower said, “I’m glad Taylor’s owning up to her mistake.” She is human, and everybody make mistakes occasionally. She is still one of the greatest artists of all time, regardless of this.
For some, though, Swift’s apology fell short. Another admirer who has since stopped following Swift on social media stated, “She can apologize all she wants, but she’s lost me.” “I just want to listen to her music and not have to hear about politics.”
Swift’s apologies appeared to some to be an attempt to retrace her steps without completely withdrawing her support. Swift has made it apparent that she still supports Kamala Harris, despite the fact that she is now aware of the negative effects of her political stance. Swift declared, “I’m not withdrawing my support for Kamala.” But I apologize if it caused discomfort for a few of you. I never intended to do that.
Swift is hardly new to controversy, but it seems that this most recent incident has caused her to consider the difficult balancing act between her career as a pop singer and her advocacy for political causes. She apologized, acknowledging that she might have miscalculated the desire for political endorsements among her audience.
Swift stated, “Maybe I should keep in mind that not everyone comes to me for that. I’ve always believed in standing up for what I believe in.” It’s acceptable if some of you just want to groove to “Shake It Off.” I swear I’ll resume creating the songs you enjoy.
Swift is obviously attempting to balance upholding her morals with admitting that she might have gone too far in fusing her private life with her public persona. She said, “I’ll definitely think twice before making a political post again.” “I never want to cause alienation among my fans.”
What next steps does Taylor Swift take? Although it’s unlikely that this incident will have a major negative impact on Swift’s career, it’s obvious that she has gained important insight into the dangers of combining politics with entertainment. Swift’s apology may be a step in the right direction toward striking a balance between her private convictions and her public persona as a global pop icon in a world where every action made by celebrities is closely watched and analyzed by the public and the media.
Swift is getting back to what she does best for the time being: music. She hinted that the universal themes of love, heartbreak, and self-discovery would take center stage on her upcoming album instead of the challenges facing the entire world. She chuckled, “I think we all need a break from the heavy stuff.” “I swear, my next album will not feature any political content at all.”
It remains to be seen whether Taylor Swift’s apology can heal the split with her fan base, but one thing is certain: she is back in damage control mode and eager to put the politics behind her and focus on her music, which is what initially made her a success.
Ultimately, Swift may have needed to tell her most devoted Swifties that her endorsement of Kamala Harris was a “buzzkill” for them. After all, even famous pop stars occasionally misjudge the situation.
Leave a Reply